Range Manager
Range Manager scores 39/100 on this site's structural exposure measure — a middling reading that undersells how much of the job is physical fieldwork and in-person negotiation that resists remote automation.
We have not ingested real-world usage data for this occupation yet. We show a band only where genuine data exists, rather than estimate one.
What a range manager actually does
Range managers study and manage rangeland — the grasslands, shrublands, and semi-arid terrain used for grazing, wildlife habitat, and recreation across much of the western United States — to keep it productive without degrading it. A large share of the job is fieldwork: walking pastures and allotments to assess vegetation health, soil condition, and forage availability, then using that data to set stocking rates and rotation schedules for livestock grazing.
Range managers issue and monitor grazing permits on public land, check operators for compliance with permit conditions, and use prescribed burning, herbicide treatment, and reseeding to control invasive species and restore degraded rangeland.
Because rangeland typically serves multiple, competing purposes — cattle grazing, wildlife habitat, recreation, watershed protection — much of the job is negotiation: mediating between ranchers, environmental groups, tribal governments, and agency priorities to reach a management plan that holds up on the ground and in front of stakeholders who don't always agree. Most range managers work for federal land agencies (the Bureau of Land Management, U. S.
Forest Service), state wildlife or agriculture departments, or as private consultants to ranching operations, and the job typically requires a bachelor's degree in range science, rangeland ecology, or a related natural resource field.
Why it reads this way
Range Manager scores 39/100 on this site's structural exposure measure — a middling reading that undersells how much of the job is physical fieldwork and in-person negotiation that resists remote automation. Assessing rangeland condition, monitoring for compliance, and running a prescribed burn all require a person physically present on often-remote terrain; no commercial system inspects vegetation health or enforces grazing-permit compliance from a desk.
The negotiation side of the job — mediating between ranchers, environmental groups, and agency stakeholders with genuinely conflicting interests — depends on trust and in-person relationship-building that AI tools don't replicate. Real-world hiring data points toward understaffing rather than displacement: the U. S.
Forest Service lost more than a quarter of its full-time staff in a single recent year amid federal hiring freezes and budget shortfalls, and trail and land-management programs report their lowest staffing levels in 15 years — a resourcing crisis, not an automation one.
BLS projects 3-4% employment growth for this occupation through 2034, about average, with roughly 2,500 openings expected over the decade as agencies work to rebuild a workforce that budget cuts have thinned, not replace it with software.
Skills this role draws on
We don't yet have task-by-task time-share data for this occupation, so we can't show which specific tasks carry the exposure score above. This is the real skill set instead.
Typical salary range (USD)
$47,550–$110,410
Average: $73,010/yr
Range source: BLS OEWS wage data via O*NET OnLine (2025 release), SOC 19-1031.02 'Range Managers'
Average source: BLS OEWS wage data for Range Managers (19-1031.02) via O*NET OnLine, 2025 wage data (Annual Median Wage)
Related careers
Head-to-head comparisons
Range Manager scores 39/100, but the job is dominated by physical fieldwork (rangeland condition assessment, permit compliance checks, prescribed burning) and in-person negotiation between ranchers, environmental groups, and agencies with genuinely conflicting interests — neither task can be performed remotely. Real-world hiring data points toward understaffing rather than displacement: the U.S. Forest Service lost more than a quarter of its full-time staff in a single recent year amid federal hiring freezes and budget shortfalls, a resourcing crisis rather than an automation one. BLS projects 3-4% growth through 2034 with roughly 2,500 openings, as of 2026-08-12.
This is a researched judgment (checklist v1.2), not a statistical measurement — it sits alongside, not instead of, the structural exposure signal above. Next scheduled review: 2027-02-12.
Data sources & methodology
Salary data: BLS OEWS wage data via O*NET OnLine (2025 release), SOC 19-1031.02 'Range Managers'. Min/max figures represent the 10th–90th percentile annual wage range across the United States. Average figure sourced separately: BLS OEWS wage data for Range Managers (19-1031.02) via O*NET OnLine, 2025 wage data (Annual Median Wage).
Automation Risk Score: Based on O*NET occupational analysis (19-1031.02) evaluating task complexity, physical requirements, social intelligence, and environmental variability. Methodology based on research from Frey & Osborne (Oxford, 2017).
Growth projections: 3-4% (2024-2034), about average for all occupations (BLS OOH / O*NET OnLine projections), based on BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook.