SOC 35-2014.00

Restaurant Cook

VerdictSafe
Signal 01 · structural exposure
21
/ 100

Restaurant cooking is defined by exactly the kind of variable, judgment-heavy, sensory work that resists automation: adjusting seasoning by taste, reading how a piece of meat or fish is actually cooking rather than following a fixed timer, and re-plating a dish differently based on a customer's specific request, none of which a fixed-script system handles well.

Signal 02 · real-world AI usage
Not yet available

We have not ingested real-world usage data for this occupation yet. We show a band only where genuine data exists, rather than estimate one.

What this is not
Neither reading measures whether any single restaurant cook has lost work to AI. That data does not exist anywhere yet — both signals describe tasks, not headcount.
How we calculated this →

What a restaurant cook actually does

Restaurant cooks prepare, season, and cook dishes, soups, meats, vegetables, sauces, and desserts, following a menu that can change daily and adjusting technique in real time based on how ingredients look, smell, and cook. Daily work includes regulating oven, broiler, grill, and roaster temperatures to hit exact doneness targets, portioning, arranging, and garnishing finished plates before they go to servers or diners, inspecting and cleaning food-preparation areas to hold sanitary standards, and monitoring ingredient freshness to rotate stock correctly.

The job is intensely physical and hands-on: the large majority of cooks stand and handle tools and ingredients almost continuously through a shift, work in genuinely hot or cold conditions, and wear protective equipment daily against burns and cuts. Restaurant cooks work across full-service restaurants, cafés, hotels, and catering operations, a huge occupation by raw employment (over 1.

4 million workers nationally), and the role's defining challenge is producing a varied, non-repetitive menu to order under real, constant time pressure rather than executing one standardized task on a loop.

Why it reads this way

Restaurant cooking is defined by exactly the kind of variable, judgment-heavy, sensory work that resists automation: adjusting seasoning by taste, reading how a piece of meat or fish is actually cooking rather than following a fixed timer, and re-plating a dish differently based on a customer's specific request, none of which a fixed-script system handles well.

Real, current AI and robotic kitchen deployment does exist, Miso Robotics' Flippy now operates fry stations in roughly a third of White Castle locations and other quick-service chains, and the restaurant-automation market is projected to reach $28 billion in 2026, but industry analysis is consistent that this deployment concentrates in fast food's standardized, repetitive, single-task cooking (frying, single-ingredient prep), not full-service restaurant cooking's complex, variable menu work.

Industry coverage explicitly distinguishes the two: full-service automation efforts focus on front-of-house tasks like table busing and food running rather than line cooking itself, because the judgment and adaptability full-service cooking demands still meaningfully outperforms what current robotic systems can reliably deliver. O*NET's own work-context data confirms the job is overwhelmingly hands-on (76% handle tools and objects most of the time, 81% stand continuously), and BLS projects much-faster-than-average growth (7%+) through 2034.

Skills this role draws on

We don't yet have task-by-task time-share data for this occupation, so we can't show which specific tasks carry the exposure score above. This is the real skill set instead.

Menu-Based Cooking & SeasoningTemperature & Doneness ControlPlating & PresentationFood Safety & SanitationWorking Under Time PressureIngredient Freshness Judgment
Pay & demand

Typical salary range (USD)

$26,980–$46,420

Average: $37,390/yr

Demand
High
Growth outlook
Strong
Projected growth
7%+ (2024-2034, much faster than average, Bright Outlook)

Range source: BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2023-2025
Average source: BLS OEWS wage data for Cooks, Restaurant (35-2014.00) via O*NET OnLine, 2025 wage data (Annual Median Wage); min/max from BLS OEWS May 2023 10th/90th percentile

Training
Few months to 2 years (on-the-job training; culinary school optional)
On-the-Job TrainingCulinary School / Vocational Program (optional)ServSafe Food Handler Certification
Research verdict
Assessed as of 2026-08-17
Safe

Restaurant Cook scores 79/100 (Medium confidence, both pillars cover this code), clearing the mandatory physical-automation check under RESEARCH-CHECKLIST.md §2a. Real, current, commercial-scale robotic kitchen deployment exists, Miso Robotics' Flippy operates fry stations in roughly a third of White Castle locations, and the restaurant-automation market is projected to reach $28 billion in 2026, but this deployment is concentrated in fast food's standardized, single-task, repetitive cooking, not full-service restaurant cooking's variable, judgment-heavy menu work. Industry coverage explicitly distinguishes the two, confirming full-service kitchens remain 'far more' resistant given the complexity and non-standardization of the work, with automation efforts there concentrated on front-of-house tasks instead. As of August 2026, no commercially deployed system independently cooks a full, varied restaurant menu to order. BLS projects much-faster-than-average growth (7%+) through 2034, and this is one of the largest occupations covered on this site (1.46 million workers).

Last updated: December 2025Source: BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2023-2025

Data sources & methodology

Salary data: BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2023-2025. Min/max figures represent the 10th–90th percentile annual wage range across the United States. Average figure sourced separately: BLS OEWS wage data for Cooks, Restaurant (35-2014.00) via O*NET OnLine, 2025 wage data (Annual Median Wage); min/max from BLS OEWS May 2023 10th/90th percentile.

Automation Risk Score: Based on O*NET occupational analysis (35-2014.00) evaluating task complexity, physical requirements, social intelligence, and environmental variability. Methodology based on research from Frey & Osborne (Oxford, 2017).

Growth projections: 7%+ (2024-2034, much faster than average, Bright Outlook), based on BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook.

Learn more about our methodology