SOC 25-9042.00

Teaching Assistant

VerdictHigher Risk — exposed on paper only
Signal 01 · structural exposure
57
/ 100

Teaching Assistant reads as exposed on the numeric task-based score, but the actual day-to-day work leans heavily on hands-on physical care that current AI and robotics cannot perform: assisting students with disabilities through toileting, mobility, and hygiene needs specified in their IEP, physically de-escalating behavioral incidents in real time, and constantly supervising recess, lunch lines, and hallway transitions where a human adult must be physically present.

Signal 02 · real-world AI usage
Medium
band, not a number

In real usage data, AI shows up in this job about as often as the average occupation: not high, not negligible.

Technical detail

Based on Microsoft's "Working with AI" study of real Copilot conversations mapped to O*NET tasks (arXiv 2507.07935): Teaching Assistants, Except Postsecondary scored 0.169 on AI applicability, within one standard deviation of the cross-occupation mean (0.159, stdev 0.098) across all 785 SOC codes studied — banded here as Medium real-world AI usage relative to other occupations.

What this is not
Neither reading measures whether any single teaching assistant has lost work to AI. That data does not exist anywhere yet — both signals describe tasks, not headcount.
How we calculated this →

What a teaching assistant actually does

Teaching assistants — also called instructional paraprofessionals or paraeducators — work under a certified teacher's supervision to support small groups or individual students who need extra help keeping pace with a lesson. A typical day might mean pulling a struggling reader aside for guided practice while the teacher runs the rest of the class, walking the room during independent work to answer questions and redirect off-task behavior, or organizing materials before the next period.

Paraprofessionals assigned to special education classrooms take on more physically demanding duties: implementing a student's IEP-specified accommodations, providing hygiene and mobility assistance for students who need it, carrying out behavior-support plans written by a psychologist or special-education teacher, and de-escalating behavioral incidents in real time. Outside the classroom, TAs supervise recess, lunch, hallway transitions, and bus loading — unstructured time that requires constant, hands-on presence rather than academic instruction.

The role generally doesn't include independent lesson-planning or grading authority; those stay with the certified teacher of record. Entry requirements vary sharply by state: federal law (ESSA Title I) sets a floor of a high school diploma plus either 48 semester hours of college credit, an associate's degree, or a passing score on a local paraprofessional exam, while only about a third of states layer a formal state certification exam or renewal-credit requirement on top of that federal floor.

Why it reads this way

Teaching Assistant reads as exposed on the numeric task-based score, but the actual day-to-day work leans heavily on hands-on physical care that current AI and robotics cannot perform: assisting students with disabilities through toileting, mobility, and hygiene needs specified in their IEP, physically de-escalating behavioral incidents in real time, and constantly supervising recess, lunch lines, and hallway transitions where a human adult must be physically present.

That protection is stronger than the job's credentialing, which is comparatively weak — federal law sets only a baseline diploma-plus-college-credit requirement, and just a third of states layer on a real state certification exam, so this isn't a hard legal wall the way a nursing or teaching license is.

A specific search for AI or robotics actually replacing paraprofessional headcount in a US school district found no case that cleared commercial scale; the closest example, a small New York district's AI-classroom-robot pilot, was paused after community and state pushback rather than expanded.

BLS projects a 1% employment decline through 2034, but BLS attributes that to enrollment and demographic trends, not automation — real, current reporting instead documents an acute, ongoing paraprofessional and special-education staffing shortage in many districts, including one major city where a union estimated roughly 1,600 vacancies.

Skills this role draws on

We don't yet have task-by-task time-share data for this occupation, so we can't show which specific tasks carry the exposure score above. This is the real skill set instead.

Classroom SupportBehavior ManagementSmall-Group InstructionIEP/504 Accommodation SupportStudent SupervisionPatienceCommunication with Teachers & Parents
Pay & demand

Typical salary range (USD)

$23,710–$48,140

Average: $36,430/yr

Demand
High
Growth outlook
Declining
Projected growth
-1% (2024-2034)

Range source: BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook, May 2024 (Median Annual Wage)
Average source: BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2023 (Annual Mean Wage, SOC 25-9045)

Training
0-2 years
High School Diploma (federal ESSA minimum)College Coursework or Associate's Degree (48 semester hours, per ESSA)State Paraprofessional Certification (required in roughly a third of states)District/State Background Check
Research verdict
Assessed as of 2026-08-10
AI-resistant despite the paperwork

As of 2026-08-10, Teaching Assistant scores 43/100 on structural exposure (Medium band), a middling number driven by the classroom-support and materials-organization sub-tasks this O*NET code covers. Real-world evidence points more protective than that number alone suggests: a targeted search for AI or robotics actually displacing paraprofessional headcount in a US district found no case that reached commercial scale — the closest example, a small New York district's AI-classroom-robot pilot, was paused after community and state pushback in July 2026 rather than expanded. Category 2 evidence is weak, not strong: federal law (ESSA) sets only a baseline diploma-plus-college-credit floor, and just a third of states layer a real certification exam on top, so this isn't a hard legal wall. What carries this verdict is category 3, physical/embodied task evidence: hands-on IEP-specified hygiene and mobility assistance, real-time physical de-escalation of behavioral incidents, and constant hallway/recess/lunch supervision all require a human adult physically present, and none of that is touched by any AI deployment found. BLS projects a 1% employment decline through 2034, but attributes it to enrollment and demographic trends, not automation — current reporting instead documents an acute, ongoing paraprofessional staffing shortage (a NYC union estimated roughly 1,600 vacancies as of July 2026). Cross-checked against the adjacent Special Education Teacher page (score 42, same verdict) — consistent, no divergence to flag. Net verdict: AI-resistant despite the paperwork, Medium confidence (protective evidence concentrated in one strong category — physical presence — with a genuinely weak credentialing wall disclosed rather than glossed over).

Last updated: December 2025Source: BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook, May 2024 (Median Annual Wage)

Data sources & methodology

Salary data: BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook, May 2024 (Median Annual Wage). Min/max figures represent the 10th–90th percentile annual wage range across the United States. Average figure sourced separately: BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2023 (Annual Mean Wage, SOC 25-9045).

Automation Risk Score: Based on O*NET occupational analysis (25-9042.00) evaluating task complexity, physical requirements, social intelligence, and environmental variability. Methodology based on research from Frey & Osborne (Oxford, 2017).

Growth projections: -1% (2024-2034), based on BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook.

Learn more about our methodology