At risk / Medical and Health Services Manager
SOC 11-9111.00

Medical and Health Services Manager

VerdictHigher Risk — exposed on paper only
Signal 01 · structural exposure
79
/ 100

Structural exposure score derived from 2 independent sources (OpenAI "GPTs are GPTs" (human_rating_beta) + AIOE (Felten, Raj & Seamans)), each normalized against its own full reference population and combined by simple average, then converted to a percentile.

Signal 02 · real-world AI usage
Medium
band, not a number

In real usage data, AI shows up in this job about as often as the average occupation: not high, not negligible.

Technical detail

Based on Microsoft's "Working with AI" study of real Copilot conversations mapped to O*NET tasks (arXiv 2507.07935): Medical and Health Services Managers scored 0.163 on AI applicability, within one standard deviation of the cross-occupation mean (0.159, stdev 0.098) across all 785 SOC codes studied, banded here as Medium real-world AI usage relative to other occupations.

Corroborating signal from the Anthropic Economic Index (Claude.ai/API conversations, a different product and userbase than the Microsoft data above): Medical and Health Services Managers shows measurable Claude usage tied to this occupation's tasks (observed exposure 0.066), though at low absolute volume. Treat as directional confirmation, not a second precise score.

What this is not
Neither reading measures whether any single medical and health services manager has lost work to AI. That data does not exist anywhere yet — both signals describe tasks, not headcount. This page is not a prediction that this job disappears.
How we calculated this →

What a medical and health services manager actually does

Medical and health services managers plan, direct and coordinate the business side of healthcare delivery. The Bureau of Labor Statistics counted 640,400 of them in 2025. They run whole facilities, single clinical departments such as intensive care or physical therapy, or the practice of a physician group. O*NET's sample titles show the range: Nurse Manager, Nursing Director, Clinical Director, Cancer Center Director, Health Information Management Director and Healthcare System Director.

The work is mostly about staff and money. O*NET's highest-rated tasks are directing, supervising and evaluating medical, nursing, technical and clerical staff, maintaining computerized record systems, running facility programs, managing budgets and service rates, and setting work schedules. Further down the list are monitoring the use of beds, diagnostic services and staff, recruiting and training personnel, coordinating between governing boards, medical staff and department heads, and inspecting facilities for emergency readiness and regulatory compliance.

In the O*NET survey, 75% of respondents have face-to-face discussions every day, 48% make decisions every day, and 82% rate their responsibility for other workers' outcomes as high or very high. A bachelor's degree is the typical entry requirement. Hospitals employ 28% of these managers, physician offices 13% and nursing and residential care facilities 9%.

Why it reads this way

Medical and Health Services Manager scores 21/100 on this site's structural exposure measure, in the Higher Risk band. The number reflects the shape of the O*NET task list: most of it is scheduling, budgeting, record-keeping, reporting, policy writing and data analysis, the kinds of work that language models handle well. Real-world use is ordinary rather than extreme. Microsoft's study of Copilot conversations scores this occupation 0. 163 on AI applicability against a cross-occupation average of 0. 159.

The Anthropic Economic Index shows a small but non-zero exposure of 0. 066, higher than roughly 70% of the 756 occupations in that file (our count; 411 of them score zero).

Some tasks inside the manager's week are already being handed to software. Epic's Agent Factory, reported in August 2026 by HealthSystemCIO, is open to only a handful of customers. Loma Linda University Health built an agent that scans charts every four hours for emergency department patients who can move to a less crowded campus, and reports transfers up 21% and bed utilization up 15%. ECU Health's transfer-request summaries save about 20 hours a week, roughly half a full-time position.

Those figures come from Epic and its customers without independent checks, and ECU describes its tool as decision support rather than decision replacement. Even so, this is O*NET's task of monitoring the use of beds, facilities and staff, done in part by software.

One legal wall exists, and it is narrow. BLS says all states require licensure for nursing home administrators. Federal long-term care rules (42 CFR 483. 70) say a nursing facility's governing body must appoint an administrator who is licensed by the State where licensing is required, is responsible for managing the facility and is accountable to that body. That requirement attaches to a named individual, which makes it stronger than a paperwork rule. But it covers one subtype.

Hospital executives, clinical department managers, practice managers and health information managers have no equivalent license, and BLS says only that some positions may require a registered nurse or social worker license. Nursing and residential care facilities employ 9% of the occupation, and not every manager there is an administrator, so the wall protects a small slice.

Nothing physical protects the rest. In O*NET's survey, 50% of these managers sit continually or almost continually and another 29% sit more than half the time. The job runs on meetings, data and decisions rather than on handling equipment or patients. The argument that managing people is inherently human is real, but this site's research checklist does not accept it alone, because the same argument was made about paralegals, radiologists and translators before software absorbed parts of their work.

A license or a physical task has to back it up, and for most of this occupation neither does.

We also searched for evidence against this reading. We looked for a named U. S. health system that cut manager positions and credited AI, and found none; the 2026 layoff roundups visible to us (Becker's Hospital Review trackers, read only as search summaries) tie administrative and leadership cuts to finances and restructuring. That is a search result, not proof of absence.

The Joint Commission and the Coalition for Health AI published guidance on September 17, 2025 that frames AI as something health systems must govern internally, which gives managers new oversight work as well as taking some tasks away.

BLS projects 24% growth from 2025 to 2035, or 155,100 jobs on a 2025 base of 640,400 (about 795,500 by 2035, our sum), much faster than average, with about 62,300 openings a year. Median pay was $123,860 in May 2025. Strong demand is not evidence of automation resistance, since a growing occupation can still hand tasks to software; this site read Financial Manager the same way.

The At risk label applies the checklist mechanically: a low structural score, and a license wall that covers one subtype. It describes task exposure, not a forecast of fewer managers. So far the evidence points to a changed job, not a vanishing one.

Managers who work in Epic or MEDITECH, which O*NET lists among the occupation's tools alongside Tableau and Excel, and who own scheduling, staffing and capacity decisions rather than only reporting on them, are closest to the oversight work that governance guidance assigns to people. A registered nurse license, which BLS says some manager positions require, also keeps a clinical route open.

Skills this role draws on

Staff Supervision and Performance EvaluationHealthcare Budgeting and Financial ManagementRegulatory and Accreditation ComplianceWorkforce Scheduling and Resource AllocationElectronic Health Record Systems (Epic, MEDITECH)Healthcare Data Analysis and Quality ReportingCross-Department Coordination (Boards, Medical Staff, Department Heads)
Pay & demand
$73,390–$224,340
10th–90th percentile, USD/year
Median: $123,860/yr
Demand
High
Growth outlook
Strong
Projected growth
24.2% (2025-2035), much faster than average

Range source: BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025 (via BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook, page last modified 2026-08-27, and O*NET OnLine local wages for 11-9111.00)
Median source: BLS OEWS May 2025 annual median wage ($123,860) for Medical and Health Services Managers (11-9111), via the BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook and O*NET OnLine. This is the median (50th percentile), not the survey mean, which was not available to us. min = 10th percentile ($73,390); max = 90th percentile ($224,340).

Research verdict
Assessed as of 2026-10-28
At risk

Medical and Health Services Manager scores 21/100 (Medium structural confidence), the high-exposure branch of the research checklist. The one real legal wall found, the state license that federal nursing-facility rules (42 CFR 483.70) require of a nursing home administrator, covers a single subtype of a 640,400-job occupation, and no physical or hands-on wall applies to the rest. No named health system was found cutting manager positions because of AI, and BLS projects 24% growth through 2035, so this verdict describes task exposure and thin protection, not a forecast of job losses, as of 2026-10-28.

Last updated: October 2026Source: BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025 (via BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook, page last modified 2026-08-27, and O*NET OnLine local wages for 11-9111.00)

Data sources & methodology

Salary data: BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025 (via BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook, page last modified 2026-08-27, and O*NET OnLine local wages for 11-9111.00). Median figure sourced separately: BLS OEWS May 2025 annual median wage ($123,860) for Medical and Health Services Managers (11-9111), via the BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook and O*NET OnLine. This is the median (50th percentile), not the survey mean, which was not available to us. min = 10th percentile ($73,390); max = 90th percentile ($224,340)..

Task descriptions: Based on O*NET occupational analysis (11-9111.00).

Real-world AI usage band: Microsoft's "Working with AI" study of Bing Copilot conversations mapped to O*NET tasks (arXiv 2507.07935), and corroborating data from the Anthropic Economic Index.

Growth projections: 24.2% (2025-2035), much faster than average, based on BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook.

Learn more about our methodology