SOC 33-3031.00

Fish and Game Warden

VerdictSafe — insulated today
Signal 01 · structural exposure
28
/ 100

Conservation technology in 2026 — AI camera traps, drones with thermal imaging, satellite tracking of poaching hotspots — is expanding fast and genuinely helps wardens decide where to patrol.

Signal 02 · real-world AI usage
Medium
band, not a number

In real usage data, AI shows up in this job about as often as the average occupation: not high, not negligible.

Technical detail

Based on Microsoft's "Working with AI" study of real Copilot conversations mapped to O*NET tasks (arXiv 2507.07935): Fish and Game Wardens scored 0.125 on AI applicability, within one standard deviation of the cross-occupation mean (0.159, stdev 0.098) across all 785 SOC codes studied — banded here as Medium real-world AI usage relative to other occupations.

What this is not
Neither reading measures whether any single fish and game warden has lost work to AI. That data does not exist anywhere yet — both signals describe tasks, not headcount.
How we calculated this →

What a fish and game warden actually does

Fish and game wardens are sworn law enforcement officers who patrol forests, waterways, and rural areas to enforce hunting, fishing, and wildlife protection laws. Routine duties include checking hunting and fishing licenses, inspecting catches and harvested game for legal size and bag limits, investigating poaching complaints, and patrolling remote terrain by truck, boat, ATV, snowmobile, or on foot.

Wardens collect evidence at wildlife-crime scenes, interview suspects and witnesses, make arrests, and testify in court, the same as any other peace officer — but with specialized knowledge of wildlife biology, boating law, and firearms regulations most patrol officers don't carry. Much of the job happens alone in remote locations with no immediate backup, requiring wardens to make split-second safety and legal judgment calls under real risk (armed poachers are a documented hazard of the job).

Wardens also respond to human-wildlife conflict calls, assist stranded hunters and boaters, and coordinate with search-and-rescue teams. Most states require completion of a state law enforcement academy plus specialized wildlife-law training, and many prefer a degree in wildlife management or criminal justice.

Why it reads this way

Conservation technology in 2026 — AI camera traps, drones with thermal imaging, satellite tracking of poaching hotspots — is expanding fast and genuinely helps wardens decide where to patrol. But every one of these tools stops at detection and mapping. None of them can board a boat to check a catch limit, physically arrest a poacher, or testify in court, which is the legal core of the warden's job.

Fish and game wardens are certified peace officers in nearly all states, meaning arrest authority and the power to seize illegally taken wildlife are restricted by statute to specific sworn individuals — a legal wall no detection algorithm changes.

The job's remote, physically demanding, often solo nature (patrolling backcountry alone, confronting armed violators) is also far outside what any current field robot or drone can do independently; drones supplement a warden's eyes, they don't replace the warden's authority or physical presence on the ground.

Skills this role draws on

We don't yet have task-by-task time-share data for this occupation, so we can't show which specific tasks carry the exposure score above. This is the real skill set instead.

Wildlife Law EnforcementFirearms ProficiencyBoating/Watercraft OperationEvidence CollectionWilderness NavigationReport WritingConflict De-escalation
Pay & demand

Typical salary range (USD)

$45,000–$95,000

Average: $74,060/yr

Demand
Low
Growth outlook
Declining
Projected growth
-1% or lower (2024-2034)

Range source: O*NET OnLine / BLS OEWS, 2025
Average source: O*NET OnLine / BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, Fish and Game Wardens (33-3031.00), 2025

Training
4-6 months state academy + field training
State Law Enforcement AcademyWildlife Law CertificationField Training ProgramBoating/Firearms Certification
Research verdict
Assessed as of 2026-08-10
Safe

Fish and Game Warden's structuralScore of 72/100 clears the Safe threshold, reinforced by a clean legal wall: wardens are certified peace officers in nearly all states, meaning arrest authority and the power to seize illegally taken wildlife are restricted by statute to specific sworn individuals — a legal barrier no detection algorithm changes. AI camera traps and thermal drones are expanding fast in conservation work and genuinely help wardens decide where to patrol, but they stop at detection; none can board a boat to check a catch limit, physically arrest a poacher, or testify in court, which is the legal core of the job. The role's remote, physically demanding, often-solo nature is also well outside what any current field robot performs independently.

This is a researched judgment (checklist v1.2), not a statistical measurement — it sits alongside, not instead of, the structural exposure signal above. Next scheduled review: 2027-02-10.

Sources (4)
Last updated: December 2025Source: O*NET OnLine / BLS OEWS, 2025

Data sources & methodology

Salary data: O*NET OnLine / BLS OEWS, 2025. Min/max figures represent the 10th–90th percentile annual wage range across the United States. Average figure sourced separately: O*NET OnLine / BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, Fish and Game Wardens (33-3031.00), 2025.

Automation Risk Score: Based on O*NET occupational analysis (33-3031.00) evaluating task complexity, physical requirements, social intelligence, and environmental variability. Methodology based on research from Frey & Osborne (Oxford, 2017).

Growth projections: -1% or lower (2024-2034), based on BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook.

Learn more about our methodology